My name is Marilyn but you can call me Teepee12. I am alive, if not entirely well. I plan to stay alive as long as the choice exists. I apologize in advance for any inconvenience my name or state of being might cause. Life is full of problems. Presumably my existence and name are not your biggest ones, so please deal with it yourself. I can’t help you. I lack the authority.
The other day I realized I’d gotten an award. I don’t remember which one it was, but it was addressed to Teepee12. I never intended to hide my identity when I chose this Internet ID as a username for my blog on WordPress. I chose it because I’d been using it since 2007 when my book was published. It was comfortable and familiar in an old shoe sort of way. Moreover, no one else seemed to want it and my real name was apparently heavily in demand.
I began using the Internet back in prehistory at the misty dawn of the space-time continuum. We were young then and modems ran at 1200 BPS. In those golden olden days, everyone had a “handle.” No one used real names. I began using Teepee12 after “The 12-Foot Teepee” was published and it stuck, though no one can spell it and auto-correct always changes it to Steeper (damn you auto correct!). I wish I could go back and do it over, using my real name or whatever close cousin to it I can get. There are dozens of Marilyn Armstrongs all over the Internet. Several of my namesakes died recently, so when I Googled myself yesterday, I found myself reading a lot of obituaries with my name on them. This can be weird or troubling, depending on the kind of books you read … but that’s the Internet for you.
I also discovered that I’m in my mid fifties (how nice!), have a Boston telephone number, own three houses, including one on Beacon Hill, and go by the Internet ID Marilyn00054. Hmm. Who’d have guessed? I’d like to see the place on Beacon Hill.
Doesn’t everyone Google themselves once in a while? No? You should try it if you haven’t. You’ll be amazed — and possibly appalled — at some of the crap you find out there with your name on it, unless you have a particularly unique name. My husband and I both suffer from common-name-syndrome, which means without a picture ID, no one is sure what information pertains to either of us rather than someone — not us — of the same name. Even when it does pertain to us, it’s more often than not, wrong.
A friend of ours was trying to correct the Wikipedia entry about himself. It showed him working at jobs he never held, in states he’s never visited, much less worked in. Wikipedia wouldn’t let him make corrections. It told him he didn’t have sufficient credentials to correct the entry. Being himself was not enough. You need expertise and me being me, him being him, doesn’t count. Yet I corrected a bunch of information about some movies we watch and my indicating that I have watched the movie a few times was apparently sufficient expertise for that. I don’t have a Wikipedia entry, so I don’t have to worry about it, but Garry’s brother does and I tried to correct it, but being close family doesn’t count as bona fides. Ah modern technology. Ah wilderness.
Being myself is insufficient evidence, your honor.
We have reached the point that being oneself doesn’t matter to anyone but us. Our identity is defined by electronic documents collected by daemons. Robotic data collection programs using set parameters determine Truth. No human beings review the data. If you find errors, you cannot correct them because being you isn’t enough. Human knowledge has no authority. I’d probably find that scary if I weren’t so damned funny. I know a lot of people who worry about keeping off the radar. But the thing is, the radar is so inaccurate, it doesn’t matter. No one will find you because your address is wrong, your age is off by ten years, you live in a house you never owned at the opposite end of the state and have a phone number that was disconnected over a decade ago. Your email address belongs to an ISP that went out of business in 1992 and it is spelled wrong anyhow. I think you might be safer on the radar than off.
I’ve been blogging for a while now and I can’t figure out how to get my name back. I’ve put my name on Serendipity’s header and in the “About Me” section. I sign my name when I write to people. But it apparently doesn’t matter. I have become a teepee and a teepee I shall stay. A 12-foot teepee, which is the smallest possible teepee that isn’t a miniature. It’s probably appropriate on some Karmic plane.
So, consider this my official coming out party. My name is Marilyn Armstrong. I wrote a book titled “The 12-Foot Teepee” and my online ID is Teepee12 whether I like it or not. Marilyn Armstrong is not available and I would have to be MarilynArmstrong00054 or MArmstrong876987 or something and that sounds too much like an android or robot … so for the forseeable future, I am a Teepee.
Teepee12 to you.
Related articles
- How I Didn’t Set the Publishing World On Fire – The 12-Foot Teepee and Me (teepee12.wordpress.com)
- Aaron Swartz, Internet Activist, Dies at 26 (teepee12.wordpress.com)


January 16, 2013 at 10:25 pm
Teepee, this is an awesome article! I am so far behind I searched my email under Serendipity for your postings. Of course, a gazillion (I know that is an exaggeration) came up. I scanned the list and WHOA! the title of this one grabbed me! I needed a good laugh before retiring and certainly got it here. BTW Absolutely love the photograph!
January 17, 2013 at 9:10 am
Thanks. I realized that it wasn’t just paranoia. No one seems to have worked out the whole name thing
How is it going? How are both of you? You book is coming out very soon … that’s so great!
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Serendipity
January 14, 2013 at 11:47 am
The once esteemed Boston Globe gave me a grand write up in their Obit Section. BOLD TYPE with name spelled correctly. They also, on another occasion, listed me in their trivia section “Whatever happened to…..?” (This is when I was still a prominent face on television) and a Radio Newscaster, on a dog day afternoon, breathlessly reported I was HOSPITALIZED in serious condition after being savagely beaten by an angry mob. (There’s a little truth about the angry mob — but that’s another story). I think part of this might’ve been payback for a trick played on an inebriated county medical examiner. Hey, I was just doing my job!
January 14, 2013 at 12:26 pm
You have some great stories … and not always about celebrities. Just reporting was nuts enough! Glad I didn’t get my hands on the obit. I could have done something cool with that!
Oh … and didn’t you used to be Garry Armstrong?
January 14, 2013 at 8:53 am
I feel your pain! The most popular male pairing in the world of male names, is Michael Smith. I took some comfort in knowing that there could not possibly be many Michael Eugene Smith’s out there. Wrong, it appears to be about the second most popular name combination. For a six year time period in the USAF, I kept having First Sargent’s calling me into their office to “ream” me a new one, because I either owed money or was not supporting my wife and six children. “Not me,” I said. “Check the SSN, it’s different.” Not wanting to lose face, the First Sargent would then lecture me on the “dangers” of not paying any bills or not supporting my family. I still laugh when I think about it.
The less said about internet handles the better. But honestly if folks cared enough, they’d look up the “about” section and find out your name. But as they say, a rose by any other name…
January 14, 2013 at 10:58 am
We used to live in the Roxbury area of Boston. Garry uses two r-s in his name, which is typically a British spelling rather than an American one, which helps a little. But wouldn’t you know it. We lived a few blocks from the other Garry Armstrong and he was a real piece of work. Garry got calls from his irate girlfriends, enraged boyfriends of said girlfriends. I got a really threatening one from the IRS and we had this conversation where I said, “Well, we file a joint return, so I can help you if there’s a problem.
“He’s not married.”
“The hell he’s not.”
“Is this the Garry Armstrong with Social Security number xxx-xxx-xxxx?”
“No.”
“Oh. Sorry, wrong number.”
It was like a little comedy routine. Garry had problems with credit (not surprisingly, the other GA didn’t pay his bills; the cops trying to pick him up (the other guy was a criminal too) … fortunately Garry’s all too familiar face helped because he was easy to recognize and unlikely to be the one who knocked over the gas station the night before. But this jerk lived just around the corner. What a pain!
January 14, 2013 at 11:06 am
LOL All caps because your phone call was brilliantly funny! Although not the over all story, because getting schtick for someone else’s peccadilloes is not fun.
January 14, 2013 at 12:30 pm
Anyone who has a common name has stories like this. Sometimes they are funny, or at least they are in retrospect. Not so funny at the time, usually. Isn’t it interesting how calamitous stuff because the basis of our best party patter after time does its thing.
January 14, 2013 at 12:33 pm
Interesting and oh so true! LOL
January 14, 2013 at 5:34 am
There are 518 Robert Mielke out there in just about every state in the union. I occasionally come across one when trying for my standard handle, bobmielke. I too started this internet online thing a long time ago, before the World Wide Web started up. I made up my mind early on that I is who I is. I’m not a TrunkMonkey or BullFart or any other anonymous person. Mielke is not nearly as common as Armstrong so I’m usually safe using it. I just Googled my name and found doctors, psychiatrists and a couple of profile photos that looked like mug shots.
Not trying to one up you but I was using 300 & 600 baud modems with a shareware software program called ProComm, now part of Datastorm Technologies, Inc.. ProComm was so good that it was finally marketed as a commercial product.
I was surprised to see my name in Google+ circles and all type of posts that I put up in 25-30 forums I’ve frequented. I know I’ve got hundreds if not thousands of my photographs out there since I started publishing them 6 years ago. If you put it on the web it’s still there, somewhere.
January 14, 2013 at 11:06 am
I wouldn’t have guessed there were so many Bob Mielkes. I was surprised at how many of ME there are. I thought Marilyn wasn’t such a common name, but apparently it’s common enough.
My first modem was a 600, but I worked for a very advanced employer and that was considered VERY fast … and I was working in Oakland via modem from Boston and had to log on to the server there, so he felt I needed the extra speed. Imagine 600 bps as fast!
January 14, 2013 at 11:09 am
My first IBM PC had no hard drive and 256K of RAM memory. They thought that was fast. LOL
January 14, 2013 at 11:21 am
I had an Amstrad dedicated word processor that preceded the commodore 64. Neither had resident memory and we used to swap floppy (they were really floppy) disks. My first personal computer was a very early Mac, called an Apple +. It had 1 megabyte of memory, no hard drive as we understand it. When I upgraded to 1.5 MB, everyone went “OOOOOO” .
When I got my first PC (I ran both PCs and Macs for years), it was REALLY slow… XT I think. It had a 5 MB hard drive and everyone thought it was really HOT. Wow. The next one, another Apple, had a 40 MB hard drive and I couldn’t imagine ever needing anything bigger.
Now I worry if my 3 TB external will be enough for a while, anyway. It’s the photographs. If I stopped taking pictures, I wouldn’t need more space
January 14, 2013 at 11:53 am
Because I store all my “keepers” online at SmugMug my 500 gig hard drive on my iMac still has 375 gig free. I shoot everything in RAW format so my photo files are huge. THe new D800, at 36.3 Mpixel resolution produces RAW file that are around 50 Meg each. Ouch!
January 14, 2013 at 12:34 pm
You are better at trusting than I am. May the force be with you.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Serendipity
January 14, 2013 at 2:15 am
Holy cow. I don’t know whether to laugh my head off or be very, very scared by technology “knowing” me better than (gulp) me!! Ok, Teepee it is!! LOL.
January 14, 2013 at 11:12 am
It’s not that it knows you better. It’s that everyone believes the computer rather than YOU. How many times have you had an argument which goes: “I paid that.” “It says here you didn’t.” “I don’t care what it says. I paid it. I have the cancelled check.” “Well, you’ll need to …”
How about THEY fix THEIR mistake as opposed to running me in circles to fix it? That’s the thing that I like best about paying through the bank. When I get that “I never got the payment,” the bank calls and explains the facts: “We have a copy here of your signed deposit. Do you need a copy of it for your records? And please make sure to remove any late charges or othe fees caused by your error. Thank you.” I love it.
With a name like Deb Stone, you’ve got your hands full, too.
January 14, 2013 at 1:42 am
Surely you know the one about the fellow who went to see a psychiatrist and said, “Doc, I’m confused. There are days when I don’t know whether I’m a teepee or a wigwam!”
“I know what’s troubling you,” the doctor replied. “The problem is, you’re two tents!”
January 14, 2013 at 1:43 am
Ouch!