A Firestorm of Misinformation, Rich Paschall
There are always items in the news that bring out the social media commentators. There’s the economy, Obama Care, and campaign finance laws. There are Pipelines and Trade Agreements. There is religious freedom and freedom of speech. It is that Freedom of Speech thing that lets the haters and misinformers run rampant on the internet.
© 2007 Nuno Pinheiro & David Vignoni & David Miller & Johann Ollivier Lapeyre & Kenneth Wimer & Riccardo Iaconelli / KDE / LGPL 3 with permission.
It seems a lot of people have time to create graphics with so-called information and historical quotes (internet memes). Some are very artistically created with nice pictures of a president or other important historical person in the background. If you are on Facebook, Instagram or Twitter enough, it seems some of these historical figures are speaking out of both sides of their mouths. One of my favorite internet memes states “The problem with quotes found on the internet is that they are often not true. – Abraham Lincoln.”
Many of the quotes are easily disputed. I like to type the first phrase of an internet quote or meme into Google search to see what I get. Sometimes I immediately get proof the quote is false. Sometimes I find the quote is true, but it was said by someone else. It seems popular to attribute interesting political and social quotes to George Carlin, even if someone else said it. Do we think a quote is more believable if a more famous person said it?
I have often seen a quote attributed to former President Jimmy Carter. It says “If you don’t want your tax dollars to help the poor, then stop saying you want a country based on Christian Values, because you don’t.” While it seems like something Carter may have said post-presidency, he did not say it. Yet, it is frequently re-quoted all across the internet. Many sites will use it to drive home their point by indicating what this thoughtful and highly regarded human being has to say.
It was actually said by comedian John Fugelsang (Snopes.com here). I guess if the quote comes from a comedian rather than a former president, it is harder to beat people over the head with it.
In addition to a simple Google search for the quote or alleged fact, you can go to websites dedicated to debunking internet stories.
The most popular is Snopes.com. It calls itself “the definitive Internet reference source for urban legends, folklore, myths, rumors, and misinformation.” It has to work extra hard to keep up with the mountains of internet crap published daily. Still, I usually find out whether some really convenient quote to prove a point is actually true or false. Usually they are false.
Tech Republic has a list of the Top Ten websites dedicated to debunking internet rumors and hoaxes. Snopes leads the list but you will find other reliable websites that can help you quickly deal with stories on Facebook that seem too convenient in proving a biased point of view.
Despite easy access to the truth, haters choose to believe whatever is posted on the internet if it can be twisted to support their position. They then take the misinformation and share it with their friends, who in turn do the same. I like to post an article or link into a comment under these false memes, but it does not seem to matter. Comments continue to be made after mine in support of the lie, as if posting the true story meant nothing. It is infuriating, to say the least.
The anger and hate behind the false stories and memes was out in full force recently due to some “hot button” topics in the news. The confederate flag debate was raging following the murder of nine black church-goers in South Carolina. Haters from both sides condemned the “opposition” for their point of view. While one side says the flag represents slavery and racism, the other claims the flag is a historical battle flag, part of their heritage. The name calling continued for quite a while.
Bringing out more internet lies than you can count was the historic Supreme Court decision on gay marriage. We previously looked at the legal aspects of the case in “It Is So Ordered.” But not many respondents on social media were interested in the facts.
Celebrants quickly hailed the decision as if their social pressure brought about change, rather than coming as a result of well argued points of law. Detractors saw this as the downfall of society and many Republicans vowed to have such a decision overturned by some undetermined method. Apparently they are unaware that the Supreme Court has the final word on Constitutional law. That is probably why we call them the “Supreme Court.”
With homophobic commentary out in abundance, never was so much hate poured out in the name of God. I had reposted some Facebook comments by Fr. James Martin, SJ on my facebook. I had noted he had linked to some thoughtful articles on same-sex marriage. He asked people to respond to the court’s decision with love. You know, “love thy neighbor.”
He did not come out in favor of the decision, he just asked us to love one another. What did he get for his trouble? The haters let him have it full force. The advised him “you’ll be spending your eternity in hell.” I guess there are bad consequences to preaching love. The next day, in response to another posting calling for love and understanding, the good Father had to add to his facebook post “NB: No ad hominem. No uncharitable comments. No homophobic comments. One to two posts per person.” Nope, that did not work for him.
The bad part of social media is the ease in which hate, anger and lies are spread. Impressionable people can find support for their misguided thoughts, and feel they have backing for whatever hate or heinous acts they perpetrate. While we all support the idea of Freedom of Speech, it is safe to say our founding fathers had no idea how quickly lies could become accepted as truth.
And all of this happens in an era where the truth so easy to find. If you are interested in truth.