I’m sharp as a tack. Sharper. More like a razor. Just because I don’t know why I’m in this room, what I came to get, or why I need whatever it is, don’t call me confused. Where are my car keys? And my glasses?
Why is everyone always stealing my stuff?
Confusion is for losers. Make America great again!
CONFUSED | THE DAILY POST
Paula asked us for a black & white picture of a favorite something. There were so many candidates, I wasn’t sure where to start to find a picture to fit this challenge. Then, I found this picture. I forgot I’d taken it a couple of weeks ago. It was just waiting in my files.
This is my Olympus OM-D E-M5 fitted with an Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 12-50mm f/3.5-6.3 EZ Zoom lens with the macro setting.
I have had many cameras over the years. I also have two other excellent Olympus PEN cameras, but this camera is special. With it, I have had the joy of falling in love with photography again. At first, the camera seemed a bit daunting, but it each time I use it (and I use it often), I love it more.
Why is it my favorite? How can you explain love? It’s ineffable. The way it feels. Its balance. The quality of the pictures. Sometimes, I just hold it because I love having it in my hands.
Love is not entirely rational. I haven’t felt this way about any camera in a many years.
After weeks of no rain at all, suddenly we’ve been getting thunderstorms in the afternoon. It’s probably because of the heat and humidity. I remember, when I was a kid, when the weather got like this — before we had weather channels or 24 hours news or the internet — we expected thunderstorms. When you got a lot of heat and steamy air, you expected thunder and lightning to follow.
We’d head for Mary’s house because she had a covered porch. There, we could play monopoly and watch the rain. Rainy afternoons are full of memories.
I am glad we’re finally getting some rain. It will take a lot of days like this to make up for the weeks of drought.
I love reading the papers and talking about what’s going on in the world. You used to be able to do that without getting caught up in ‘partisan politics’. By that I mean that there were ‘facts’ about what was happening on a given topic that everyone could agree about. People may have disagreed about how to deal with the problem of, say, increasing crime and declining GDP. But there was at least a consensus that the former was in fact increasing and the latter was in fact declining.
Not so today. Facts have become the meat and potatoes of partisan politics. If you’re a liberal and/or a Democrat you believe that unemployment is down. If you are a conservative and/or Republican you believe that unemployment is up. How can anyone have a rational discussion about a problem if the nature or even the existence of the problem is itself the issue? When people argue whether a ‘fact’ is, in fact, a ‘fact’?
Talk shows and news interviews often devolve into shouting matches about what used to be called empirically proven facts. I don’t want this to happen in my personal life. Therefore, unless I am sure we are in the same ideological camp, I am careful not to talk about anything that could remotely have one liberal and another conservative interpretation. That rules out a wide swath of conversation topics and makes talking to strangers even more difficult for me. I’m not good at small talk under the best of circumstances.
It also presents the problem of how to feel out someone’s political views without bringing up a potentially controversial topic? I had a whole conversation with someone at a party about how much we love following the news. At no point did we reveal which version of the news we espoused. When she said that her husband only watched one channel all day, I surmised it was Fox News and that they were conservative/Republicans. I later had my ‘guess’ confirmed by a mutual friend. I am so relieved that we had not marred our pleasant conversation with the revelation that we were ideological adversaries. We would not have agreed on the statistical reality about almost anything.
This is why even well-meaning, open-minded people like me have become polarized. I am happy to listen to your views and may even be swayed by a good argument. But I will not be open to the idea that the earth is really flat, that evolution isn’t a scientifically proven process or that man-made climate change is not a real ‘thing’. In today’s world, I guess that makes me a closed-minded ideologue. So be it. My political bent nowadays is towards any view that is based on facts that can actually be proven to be true. And I want to see the evidence and decide for myself if your ‘evidence’ actually proves your ‘facts.’