Avoiding Stress, by Rich Paschall

Recently I attended a talk at work regarding avoiding stress.  We are in a deadline driven business and there can be a good deal of stress, so a talk on dealing with and reducing stress seemed like a good use of my time in a busy day. The speaker was Dr. Scott Cabrera of Higgins Sports and Spinal Rehab.  This caught my interest as I have had a variety of spinal issues and could not help but believe that some of them were caused by stress.

As I expected he had charts and a skeletal figure so he could explain to us about the spine.  He showed how we can often tense up and this is bad for the spine and the nerves connected to it.  We saw how nerves ran from the spine down the arms and legs.  Tension in the back could be the cause of arm and leg difficulty as well as neck and back pain.  Things were laid out in a colorful and clinical manner.  His main piece of advice was something I did not expect.

“Stop watching and listening to the news,” he declared.  “It adds stress to your life and is something outside of your control.”

He went on to ask how many listened to the news on the way to work.  I am certainly one of those.  I figure it is better to get it in the morning rather than right before bed.  The good doctor did not agree.  He felt it was the way to start off your day in a bad mood.  Do these short radio broadcasts really give you a look at the news?  They are just tidbits, usually of the most sensational items.  There will certainly be something to upset you as they present a preponderance of bad news.  There is no big picture.  There is no understanding.

This makes the news somewhat irrelevant.  You have not learned anything that will be useful in your day-to-day life.  In fact, these tiny slices of news can be misleading.  You can draw the wrong conclusions based on the most dire pieces of factoids thrown at you in a report lasting less than sixty seconds.  After they have successfully upset you, it is likely to be “Traffic and weather on the 8’s” if you live in a big city.  That can upset you too.

The negative morsels broadcast in the never-ending news business can pile on the chronic stress.  This can result in the release of cortisol which is not just the item that builds belly fat, but it is also reported to have adverse effects on your immune system.  Did you know the news could adversely affect your health?

If you have paid attention to the news in this social media driven era of so-called reporting, you will notice how many people get riled up over tidbits of news. These can be tidbits that are essentially meaningless to the larger story, but enough to provide the “confirmation bias” lurking there for someone.  Many use the news or worse, social media memes, as a way to confirm their point of few, rather than to learn anything.  This turns conversations and social postings into upsetting arguments.  Is this making you happier?


Also helping you to get riled up is the spin put on the news by certain programing.  If you are right of center, you may be watching FOX to help confirm your point of view.  If you are on the other side of the fence, perhaps you can find your tidbit somewhere else.  This chasing down of miniscule pieces inhibits creative thinking.  There is no self interpretation of the news, just more proof from your side that the other side is bad.

Since news is largely about things you can not control, you might be happier if you skip the news altogether.  Consider this carefully.  Is it doing anything more than adding stress to your life?

Many will say it is not possible to live in society without being educated on the issues, but is the news actually educating you on anything?  Does learning how many people were shot today bring you closer to the policy decisions, or lack thereof, of gun control.  Does a late night tweet on a particular country bring you near to understanding the trade issues between our country and another?  There are many questions like this and you know the answer to all of them.  No.

Real journalism

What we actually need is true journalism.  We need to delve into a story in-depth so we may come away from it with the ability to do critical thinking.  Rather than a thirty-second piece, how about a story that takes a half hour to report or an article that takes a half hour or more to read.  Yes, many of these are also slanted one way or another, but if you get more than a half-minute of a story, you may stand a better chance to understand it.  Further, a thoughtful, even if time-consuming, look at a story is better than the bombardment of tidbits.

Some years ago, a television station in Chicago changed the 10 o’clock news format to be different from the other stations.  Rather than a bunch of tidbits, it examined the top stories of the day.  It looked into the background and brought the news makers on set to discuss what had happened.  The experiment did not last.  People gravitated to the pieces thrown out on the other channels.  The old format is addicting and people had to have it, no matter how little they actually gained from being upset before bedtime.

Leave the negative tidbit cycle and you will be happier.  Although I was not willing to go along with Dr. Cabrera’s assertion we should just stop listening to and watching the news, period, there is great value to avoiding the news as it is currently presented in society.  I find the tidbits on sports talk radio more interesting these days.

Dr. Scott Cabrera, D.C., Higgins Sports & Spinal Rehab, S.C.
News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier,”

Author: Rich Paschall

When the Windows Live Spaces were closed and our sites were sent to Word Press, I thought I might actually write a regular column. A couple years ago I finally decided to try out a weekly entry for a year and published something every Sunday as well as a few other dates. I reached that goal and continued on. I hope you find them interesting. They are my Sunday Night Blog. Thanks to the support of Marilyn Armstrong you may find me from time to time on her blog space, SERENDIPITY. Rich Paschall Education: DePaul University, Northeastern Illinois University Employment: Air freight professional


  1. Generally speaking, I agree with your doctor and for a long time, we almost never watched the news, except for sports and the weather. But then the world shifted on its axis. At this point, however difficult the news is, important stuff is going on. I feel I need to be part of it. I’m not going to live forever. I don’t want this “now” to be the future for everyone.

    I’m not ready to abandon my world … and I absolutely agree, the news is terrible and enormously aggravating to every part of me. So we watch the news, but when we can’t handle anymore, we watch “Voyager” or ANYTHING funny. And the dogs help, too. Dogs and other pets are a huge stress reliever.

    I basically agree with you. It’s just right now, things are bad and I can’t ignore it. There is too much at stake.

    I should add that I do more reading than watching. I don’t read everything I get — that would take more time than I could possibly devote to it, but I read selected articles from maybe a dozen different news groups including the Boston Globe and the New Yorker. TV news, as Garry frequently points out, is just headlines and has been just headlines for a very long time. If you want to know what’s going on, you have to read and not just one item, but a enough to give you context. I can’t read as much as I think I should. No time. But I try to make sure I get background from a variety of legitimate sources.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. I think the doctor was a bit extreme, but his point is well taken nonetheless. 60 Minutes or Frontline might give you something in depth. The evening news and radio news channels are just bits.


  2. I threw away my TV years ago and I don’t read the newspapers. Yes I do get the New York Times alerts on my phone but now except for local New York city news, subway and weather I delete the stories.
    The doctor is correct.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. I agree. I stopped watching TV in the late nineties, except for the newscasts and weather. In those days it was serious news, no anchor people shouting at us, just solid reportage. I quit permanently when baby Bush became President, because he was such a disaster and looked far too much like Alfred E. Neumann to comfort me. And any time I needed a news fix I had the computer, by then.
      We no longer have a local newspaper, and our TV set is collecting dust. I don’t miss the TV but I do miss the paper.
      I think Im a calmer, more balanced person because of it. Sound bites in here are the equivalent of People Magazine, and about as useful.

      My feeling is, much of this, while it relates to me in a long term way, has little or no bearing on my day to day life. I have no control over any of it, and knowing about the daily stupid pet tricks in Washington surely is not going to improve my mood or temper. A certain level of ignorance, at this stage, is most desirable.

      Liked by 2 people

  3. I’m wondering if reading an old fashioned newspaper is the way to go? I agree that the news on TV and radio does become stressful and incomplete. We do have to know what’s going on. True – there are are some things that we have no control over, but we do have to be aware of what we can control.

    Liked by 1 person

      1. The Times was always full-size and the Post has always been a tabloid. They don’t change. They remain the way they began. Tabloid isn’t really derogatory. It’s just a different format. Many tabloid papers are perfectly good reading papers.

        Liked by 2 people

        1. The Chicago Sun Times is a tabloid actually. The paper still seems to be OK. The Chicago Tribune is traditional journalism, but an ultra conservative media outlet (right of FOX) has been trying to buy it and the television and radio channels.


  4. Haven’ t had a tv since sometime in the 90’s. Do read papers sometimes, and listen to MPR (Minnesota Public Radio… Think The worst news this year are articles on what has happened to politics. Remember when Medicare and Medicaid came into being it was sponsored by the Republican party. Have become more Democrat leaning since… The temperament of the parties now are more like the late 1800s and the late 1920s. Even scarier, now for some time students are not getting enough history….lessons… Most things are in inconsequential sound bytes.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Remembering an old quote; “The dumbing down of America. What has contributed to it? Good question. I will start with school curriculums… add all the little electronic devices, TV over all.. and?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I would hang on to school curriculum because we’ve been downgrading it for a LONG time … since before I was in grade school which is more than 60 years. I think we could live with the devices, but we can’t live with kids who can’t read, can’t research, know no history, and need a calculator to do basic multiplication.

      Liked by 2 people

  6. Reblogged this on rjptalk and commented:

    There is political news, fake news and alternative news. There is entertainment news and celebrity news. Maybe we should try “no news.” Be sure to click “View original post” at the bottom to continue reading on SERENDIPITY.


Talk to me!

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.