WILL THIS WORLD BE JUST A MEMORY IN FUTURE GENERATIONS?

Flashback Friday – with editorial adjustments – from a year ago. Everything is the same and not in a good way.

I read an article that argued coal-burning generators are not doing all that much damage to the climate. This is the kind of argument that makes me gag. If you’ve ever live near a coal-burning anything, you know — without a lot of scientific testing — that it is evil stuff. I have long since concluded that science — positive and negative — can prove whatever they want to prove. But the sizzling temperature outside is not a lie and you don’t need a team of scientists to study it to know that a “heat spell” used to mean temperatures above 80 degree F — but now it’s over 100 degrees.

The fires are no lie either. Nor the flooding. There’s a new or ongoing catastrophe all the time, so many that we forget whose smoke we are breathing or where the last dam burst.

Kids swimming in the Blackstone

There is no serious dispute that humans hold significant responsibility for damaging earth’s ecology. You can’t label water pollution or unbreathable air as caused by earth’s normal climate cycles. These are things humans have created.

For more than a decade, the entire west and southwestern area of the U.S. has been running out of water. They had quite a lot to begin with because it had been going through a period of better-than-average rainfall. Since then, each year of drought has lessened the amount of available water. They are, as a friend of mine who lives there pointed out, in big trouble.

Prodigious volumes of water are necessary to sustain a modern population. (It requires, for instance, nearly 3,000 gallons of water to produce the food for a typical family dinner, according to a “Facts Brochure,” issued by the Utah Water Supply Internet site.) The water supply must serve not only individuals, but also agricultural and livestock enterprises, municipalities, businesses and industries. Indeed, 80 or 90 percent of the total consumption in agricultural areas may be attributable to irrigation alone. As a result of the relentless growth in demand, said the USGS, “Ground-water resources in the Southwest [have become] among the most overused in the United States.

The absence of water in these areas shouldn’t surprise anyone. These are designated arid regions.

“Arid regions by definition receive little precipitation— less than 10 inches (25 centimeters) of rain per year. Semi-arid regions receive 10 to 20 inches (25 to 50 centimeters) of rain per year.”

These arid regions are hard to miss because it was and is, desert. Sand and cactus. Despite all evidence pointing to this being an area that can only support a limited number of people, greed and short-sightedness have resulted in a gigantic population boom in areas with extremely fragile water resources.

Humans are greedy. Land, to a developer, equals money. Build houses, roads, malls, businesses. Count on there being more rain than usual and when if (when) that fails — because it’s an ARID REGION — then you can blame it on climate change.

The climate didn’t do it. People did.

I believe in climate change, but first and foremost, I believe humans are stupid and short-sighted. We intentionally do our worst based on personal greed and a placid lack of interest in the future.

Phoenix

Planet Earth did everything except put up billboards pointing out that much of our western land is arid land. Desert. Couldn’t everyone figure it out from the Ironwood trees and cactus? If you were a fan of western movies, remember all the westerns where ranchers keep telling farmers if they plow the land, it will destroy the grass and turn good grazing land into a desert? We were supposed to root for the farmers who were the designated “good guys.”

Except the ranchers were right and the farmers were deluded.

Ironwood in the desert

Then there was the dust bowl. Rich prairies became deserts and everyone had to move away. Bye-bye prairie. Increasing human population beyond an area’s ability to support it is the kind of idiocy modern governments are unable to resist.

We see a tree where we might want to put a road? Cut it down. For that matter, cut down the entire forest. Plant some tiny trees miles away. Point out in a dulcet-voiced advertisement how you’ve supplied the birds and animals who lived in the woods with a new place to live. No one mentions that this newly-planted area won’t viable for anything to live for many years to come — assuming those tiny trees grow into big trees and there’s no guarantee of that happening. Fifty years later, more than a billion birds are dead due to loss of habitat with millions more dying every year.

Phoenix sun through the smoke – Photo: Ben Taylor

The heat this year out west is fierce. It’s only slightly less fierce in New England. In Phoenix, the asphalt and cement emits as much heat at night as the sun produced by day. Meanwhile, cities keep growing and water levels drop. The west is perpetually on fire — unless it’s flooding.

Photo: Garry Armstrong – Phoenix at sunset

I have watched people moving to places that are already — literally — on fire or flooded. Maybe they assume whatever is going on won’t affect them personally. Stuff on the news is always “other people’s problem.” To quote Alfred E. Newman, “What, me worry?”

We can fix a lot of what ails the earth, but we have to actually do something other than argue whether planet-wide catastrophe will strike in 30, 50, or 100 years. Does it matter exactly when? I should think what matters is “IF”!

Roaring Dam – Photo: Garry Armstrong

The Blackstone River was one of the most polluted rivers in the world 60-years ago. Today you can swim in it, fish for trout, and that water feeds back into our watershed. It isn’t pristine yet, but it soon will be. This cleanup didn’t happen by itself. The planet didn’t fix it. People fixed it.

Now, back to those coal-burning generators. Haggling over how much these emissions damage the climate is as stupid as building a giant city in the middle of a desert. I’m sorry if taking care of our ecology may damage someone’s bottom line, but doing it will damage to everyone’s ultimate bottom line: staying alive and knowing their children and grandchildren will be able to live too. Air quality is not something about which we need to argue. Doctors, climate scientists, and meteorologists agree.

Clean air = GOOD.
Dirty air = BAD.

Overall, climate change is part of a much larger picture of human abuse of Earth. The heating of the earth, loss of potable water, dirty air, melting ice sheets — these are all critical and endangered parts of our ecological system. They are also about your life and the lives of our children and grandchildren.

If we are going to have future generations, they will need water to drink and air to breathe. We should be planning to make sure they have it.



Categories: #Birds, #BlackstoneRiver, #Photography, Anecdote, climate change, Earth, Ecology, Nature

Tags: , , , , , , ,

14 replies

  1. I’m at a loss for words, Marilyn. I’m housesitting for a family member who lives in a gated community. I’m watching the neighbors all water their beautiful yards each morning and shaking my head. I’m NOT trying to go on a completely different topic here; but your writing brings many things to my mind. Yes, the coal plants (and one no longer in operation about 2 miles from where I’m staying). The heat of the greed that makes a human want to build in a desert and wonder why there’s no water? Or better yet, let’s USE water for things that DON’T MATTER in the long run. In addition to the greed to ruin the land to begin with, there’s the INTENTIONAL greed in the PURPOSE that does nothing for the common good of humanity. I have a blogging friend in Phoenix. He shares the same sentiments. A friend, who once lived there, moved. The good news—good humans, one by one, TRYING to help in proactive steps. I was happy to see the kids in the Blackstone River and “feel” the goodness of the collective efforts that allowed those boys to play. I dream of each family sitting with one another sharing about how the resources around them are “used”. In my circle, some worry more of what technology might be sitting in the hands of a youngster (versus the fact potable drinking water, air quality, and global disasters won’t be solved with more stuff to throw in the land fill). My apologies for “ranting”. Your beautifully written post, that carries the message in both years, evoked much emotion. I hope you and Garry are well. I enjoy seeing you here. And as always, the captures (they enhance the message perfectly)! Take care!

    Like

    • I meant to say “I WAS at a loss for words.” I was shaking my head in agreement and TRIED to put together my thoughts. I hope they make some sense. I’m struggling with words.

      Like

      • The arrogance of humans borders on collective insanity. Yes, many of us are doing our best, but it isn’t enough, not nearly enough. Some of what we need to do is STOP doing stupid stuff. Just stop destroying the trees and turning cooling forests into asphalt that collects heat. And stop building in places that can’t support the population. You’d think it would be obvious, what with all that sand and cacti and the absence of most living creatures that this is not a well-watered place, that installing a city with millions of people isn’t a great idea. But we are so arrogant that what is obvious doesn’t matter. We’re sure that somehow, it’ll be okay anyway. Except it won’t and it isn’t.

        This morning, I used up a bottle of my “non chemical” cleaner which I use in the bathroom, kitchen, and anywhere else. It works very well. AND it comes in plastic bottles. EVERYTHING comes wrapped in some layer of plastic so yes, it’s environmentally safe — except then there are the bottles. Even the “refills” are in plastic. The only thing missing are the sprayers.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Yes, Marilyn…to all of it. Like you, I use a plant-based cleaner (Mrs. Meyers, Method, I once “belonged” to Melaleuca, but couldn’t “afford” them,..I DO have cleaning vinegar in a glass bottle). I do the best I can…my small part. I fail at it! But I’m glad to join the “team of humans” that are concerned and doing what they can.

          Like

  2. And there it is. Eloquently stated about our bleak future unless we take some dramatic action agains climate change now. If it’s not already too late.

    Like

    • The thing is, EVEN if you disagree on when the worst part of climate change will hit, is there ANY reason to not start dealing with the problem before it deals with us?

      Like

  3. Hi Marilyn, as always you have eloquently written exactly what I think. I checked south and south western states to be sure I had the right ones in my head. I did. I knew from the news of floods and fires I read.

    Like

    • It has been sizzling hot out west. A good friend lives in Phoenix and he’s finally thinking about moving back east. I think the heat has finally gotten to him. After more than 30 years. It might be closer to 40, maybe more.

      Like

  4. Marilyn, the environment has a way of paying us back for not taking care of it. Yes, it is resilient, but with our onslaught on the two dearest resources – air and water – it does not bode well. The talk of climate change is essential, but it also takes air time away from another serious concern that is made worse by climate change – our global water crisis. This is more about its availability, but we also are polluting what is left through chemical waste or lead pipes. Keitg

    Like

    • And don’t I know it. We have a well and until I moved here, I didn’t know you could drink tap water and have it taste okay. I was so used to heavily chlorinated water, that actual fresh water was an amazing experience. Of course with a well when we have a drought we live in dread the well will dry up. In town — where they actually get “city water” — have awful water which has been unfit to drink any number of times in recent years. Lead pipes AND corroded iron pipes — and a lot of water is hazardous from chemicals leached into the soil by farmers who refused to give up on nitrogen fertilizer. Of course, the “authorities” don’t tell you about water problems until they have no choice, often decades later than they should have.

      Our air — aside of pollen and dust — had been pretty clean since we have almost no industry up this way — unless you count the huge number of nuclear generators in the region. Until now when we have Canadian smoke.

      Like

      • Marilyn, the US has not bought into the concept of The Precautionary Principle, which means if an entity thinks an effort will be harmful, they need to take steps to assure the public it is not. Here we wait until years later and only after someone raises the issue. In the US, we rely on the Erin Brockovich’s of the world to call industry on the carpet for killing and harming people.

        In the true story and movie “Dark Waters,” Dupont reneged on a deal to fix things after agreeing to a study that eventually proved “causally,” their chemical runoff was harming people. This was after several years and they had to be taken court one case at a time because they reneged. After losing the first three individual court cases with fines totaling around $30 million, they settled with the rest of the claims. The sad truth is Dupont knew they were harming people and did it anyway. In fact, the company moved pregnant women away from the line where the work was done because one of the impacts was deformed babies. Keith

        Like

        • If I were God, the arrogance of humans might make me seriously reconsider the whole creation issue. I despair of seeing our species behaving with anything like compassion or even use what used to be called “commonsense,” neither common nor usually sensible.

          So much of what is wrong is just plain STUPID. We plan based on how much money it will make and the planners fight against environmental planning as if it’s the devil. So much of what we do could be done better and less destructively with little loss of income and much gained by the earth and those living on it.

          So what if a few rich people lose a percentage of additional wealth? It baffles me when people who already have more money than they can spend in ten lifetimes are in a contest with themselves to see how rich they can be before they die. And they WILL die, though they don’t seem to know it. I get so depressed about it. All that’s left is going back to taking pictures of flowers and birds. Just in case later we have neither, at least I’ll have pictures.

          Like

  5. Nothing has changed it has only gotten worse and worse in the last year!

    Like

    • We all kept waiting for climate change to occur. We thought it was going to be gradual and we’d have time or maybe just MORE time. But it came almost overnight, at least that’s what happened around here. One day, winter stopped being OUR winter and now summer is like the deep south.

      Like