SPECTRE – 007 IS BACK. AGAIN.

First, the good news. The cinematography is sometimes brilliant. A bit dark. Okay for the big screen, but I hope they brighten it up for viewing at home. Dark doesn’t play well on a small screen.

It’s a very loud movie. The explosions range from loud, to louder, to loudest. Don’t worry about hearing the dialogue though because there isn’t any. No one says anything memorable. Pity about that because given half a chance, I’m pretty sure Daniel Craig can act, but you’d never know it from “Spectre.”

spectre daniel craig

The movie is at least 20 minutes too long and has half a dozen false endings. Deleting a few false endings might have improved it.

Motivation? Plot?

Bad guys want to take over the world because they are evil. Good guys want to stop them because they are, you know, good. There are some women, too.

Sex? Either too much or not enough. I’m not sure which. Gratuitous violence? Absolutely. There were at least two scenes too violent for me during which I had to hide my eyes.

Bond survives (to make at least one more movie) in the usual way. Which is to say, the evil head of Spectre doesn’t know when to shut up. He has a devilish, incredibly complicated (slow) way to kill Bond. The bad guy has lots of time to recap every horrible thing he has ever done to Bond … while giving 007 ample opportunity to escape.

Spectre_poster

There are bad guys who refuse to die. Bond keeps killing them, but wait, they’re back! What a surprise! We’ve never seen anything like that before. Much of this was tired by the time Roger Moore was playing 007. It has gotten older, but not better. Except — the old Bond movies were usually amusing. Funny. Clever. Witty.

Spectre isn’t funny, clever or witty. It’s car chases, stunt flying, destruction of expensive machinery including at least one airplane … and of course killing. Motivation is murky, characters do stuff without apparent rhyme or reason. The high point of the movie is when Bond — in the midst of a car chase — gets stuck behind a slow driver. Sadly, that moment was over too soon, leaving a long way to the final credits.

It wouldn’t cost more to have a script. To add dialogue and a hint of motivation for characters. They have writers, so why not allow them to write? They should also hire an editor and tighten up everything, from end to end. My butt fell asleep. My brain clicked off. By the time the credits rolled, Garry and I had wicked headaches. Too many explosions, too little dialogue.

The final, perfect touch? It cost $4.75 for a bottle of water and $5.75 for a pretzel. I was short twenty cents, but they let me keep it anyway.

Wait for it to come to cable. Make your own microwave popcorn.

If you think I’m the only wet blanket who doesn’t like it, check out the review by Scott Mendelson from Forbes. And other places. It’s not a great or even good movie, but I’m sure it’ll make money. I’m sorry some it was ours.



Categories: Cinematography, Entertainment, Movie Review, Movies, Mystery and Thrillers

Tags: , , , , ,

23 replies

  1. I am sorry to hear it was a a bit of a disappointment. I loved the early movies. The dialogue was clever and Sean Connery and Roger Moore knew how to deliver it. Even the George Lazenby movie, tossed in amongst the Connery films, was not all that bad. I will wait for this one, although senseless car crashes are better on the big screen.

    Like

  2. The good old days and the James Bond style thrillers. I only remember one of Bonds female costars seems her name was Pussy Galore, that must have been Goldfinger. Do you remember the English lady double agent, I think she’s still on Saturday night, on one of the English family shows, she was a very talented actress. We don’t do movie theaters, since the seventies.

    Like

  3. Waiting for the release here in India. I believe it will be on Monday. Thanks for the excellent review. I’m surely going to miss Judy.

    Like

  4. Just one more movie I won’t get to see, but then, I don’t think I’ll be missing much this time.
    Leslie

    Like

  5. I haven’t seen a “new” James Bond in years and your review convinced me to keep it that way :-).

    Like

  6. Where’s Sean Connery and his staff of writers when you need them? Cost wise, going to a movie and having refreshments is a major expeniture. I am also so ‘mature’ that I remember going to a double feature on Sunday and taking $.50 with me. $.25 for a ticket, $.10 for popcorn and $.15 for an ice cream fudge bar.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. I’m pretty sure concessions weren’t that much the last time I saw a movie in a theater. Of course, that was in 1988. Timothy Dalton was playing Bond back in those days… but that isn’t what I watched. Never was a fan of the Bond movies…. but the songs were usually pretty good. Who’d have guessed Duran Duran would be the only artist to take a Bond theme song to #1?

    Liked by 1 person

    • 1988. Did they have cars back then? Seriously, the prices have at least doubled in the past two years around here. Both ticket prices AND concession prices. And they wonder why we don’t go to the movies more.

      The music for this one isn’t bad, but it’s nothing to write home about. The whole movie is just … mediocre. Wait for cable. Buy popcorn. Invite a squirrel to join the party.

      Like

    • Squirrel, our most recent movie excursions that have proved enjoyable….the TCM national screenings of classics like “Casablanca” and “Singing In The Rain”.

      Like

  8. I thought the ending was rushed. Also, Blofeld and Bond being raised together was a little strange.

    Liked by 1 person