THE CHEAPER MODEL

I wanted a small camera with a very long lens which I could carry in my bag. To this end, I gave up the idea of getting something classy and bought a Minolta ProShot with a 67X zoom lens. It was less than a quarter of the price of the better models. By the time I bought it, I had read up on it in a variety of places. Read all the reviews. Knew this wasn’t going to be taking pictures of the quality I’m used to but it should do the job.

According to the measurements provided by Minolta, this should be have been a slightly-too-big for my pocket camera. It turns out their measurements are off by a more than half an inch front to back. Just enough to make it not fit into any of the small camera bags. But, they included bag. It’s not much of a bag, but it’s good enough to wrap it up so when I carry it, it won’t get scratched.

This is not a pocket camera though it is smaller than any of my Olympus’ and has an insanely long lens. It’s too big for a pocket and it weighs in at more than two pounds. Heavy. It isn’t as big as the Olympus’ cameras’ but it outweighs them. So not a pocket camera. It should fit in my bag because my bag is huge. I knew I’d be carrying a camera eventually so I prepared.

What I keep noticing about “compact” cameras is they aren’t really compact. Once upon a time, they were small enough to slide in a pocket, but that time ended about 20 years ago. To make these very long-lensed cameras smaller, they compress a huge amount of lens and electronics into a small body. But nothing can make that super long lens any lighter. The optics are heavy.

It’s not plastic. No hint of plastic anyway. It is very sturdy and feels solid. Fits nicely in my hands. It is designed for real amateurs, so it has a very simple menu which is fine with me. I am totally lost in most camera menus. I won’t get lost in this one.

It came with a manual. A small one half in Japanese, but at least they give you something. It was no help on two subjects: how to use the menu (I figured it out) and the size filter it needs. I eventually found the filter size — 52mm — in one of their Q&As.

I took a few pictures.

I bought it yesterday it being almost the exact amount I had remaining from our tax refund after paying the oil bill, buying fixtures for two out of three bathrooms — AND putting money into savings.

As soon as I saw how big and heavy it is, I considered returning it. Reality said “keep it.” It’s not small and light, but I wanted that long lens without having to haul my long lens and best camera wherever we wander. I can’t haul a lot of heavy stuff anymore.

I’m pretty sure it will do what I need. Better than the iPhone but not one of the better lenses I have known. But, the price was right. It one cost less than the least expensive of my lenses, even those I bought used. It doesn’t have the fine resolution to which I’ve become accustomed but I knew that when I bought it. You can’t blame a camera for not being better than expected.

This one is exactly what I expected except bigger and heavier. Even reading those very incorrect measurements, did I really believe I’d get that huge lens in a pocketable camera? I was deluded.

For the price, it will do and it may be better than I think. I only tried it inside when the light was very low outside. Maybe the sun will shine tomorrow.



Categories: #gallery, #Photography, Anecdote, Cameras

Tags: , , ,

10 replies

  1. sorry my finger slipped. If we’re out on a drive I can take the DSLR but when I am alone and on foot it’s heavy. I have a 300mm lens that I never take because of the extra weight and the room it takes up in my luggage. 

    The little Pentax is much more portable but it would be nice if there were a longer lens available. I can use my phone too but still don’t find it comfortable to use. I prefer a camera with a shutter to touch screens.

    Like

  2. Your initial shots with this ca,era look very promising, although of course it’s hard to judge image quality when resized for WP. It’s disappointing it is bulkier than you expected, but if it’s manageable and takes decent photos then I bet you’ll get lots of use out of it!

    Like

    • It takes decent pictures, but does it the same way as the iPhone by setting the ppi at 72 then making the picture huge. I would have preferred more compression and a ppi of at least 300. I expect this is how they keep the price low. Also, it is much slower than the Olympus which is very fast. For the thousand dollar difference in price. I’ll deal with it.

      It will fit in my bag. I wasn’t expecting more. It is a good looking camera. It doesn’t look or feel cheap. It will take all my patience to wait for it to get focused. The longer it’s extended, the longer it takes.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. I always was a Minolta girl. BUT my wonderful camera(s) got too heavy, especially as I took it everywhere and my hand nearly got deformed from holding it in ‚this special way‘ I needed to take my photos. I was forced by lack of strength to go ‚lighter‘. In the end, I gave up all aspirations, nowadays I only take pics with my camera (Smartphone). Considering the possibilities, I bought the one with the best cameras and free ‚treatment programs.‘ I‘m happy with that and my phone comes with me to all my outings…. It was me who had to adapt my ‚demands‘ – and working within my greatly reduced abilities.
    You do take fab pictures. In that respect I have become an ardent follower of my blogger friends‘ art and I thank you.

    Liked by 1 person

    • You must have had one of the older, full-sized Minoltas. This one is smaller than the original DSLRs — but it isn’t much lighter. At least it isn’t much heavier.

      Enjoy taking pictures. It doesn’t matter what you use as long as you like the results.

      Like

  4. I the end the camera that is comfortable to carry beats the one that is better but gives you a back or shoulder pain if gou carry it for too long.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I hate changing lenses out in the field. I’m not one of those people who can do it one-handed. I need a flat surface. Also, I really can’t haul that much weight anymore now to I want to have to always pack and unpack the bag, trying to calculate what lenses I’ll need especially since I never know what I’m going to be doing — or usually don’t know. If the little Pentax had a really long lens, I’d be using it because it takes better pictures. It has a longer lens — but not as long as I want. I can’t walk far. A long lens saves me a lot of trying to walk on rough ground. Long lenses are not just for shooting birds.

      Liked by 2 people

Talk to me!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.