Casting is now taking place for Bond 25 (working title) and Daniel Craig will return as “007.” The movie is set for a Fall 2019 release, so there will be plenty of talk for the next year about the next film and the next Bond, if Craig does not return. In his work preparing for Bond, Craig recently visit CIA headquarters. According to the Guardian: “The agency said its motivation was ‘to combat misrepresentations and assist in balanced and accurate portrayals’ of the intelligence community.”
The Daniel Craig Years, by Rich Paschall, Sunday Night Blog
After 20 James Bond films and 40 years, EON Productions finally had something that eluded them from the start. They obtained the rights to the first Ian Fleming novel, 1953’s Casino Royale. The story had been adapted into a 1954 American television drama and a 1967 comedy spoof, but had never been given a serious big screen treatment. The chance was at hand when Pierce Brosnan declined the opportunity to go on as 007.
The change to a new Bond also meant another change in attitude at the studio now run by Barbara Broccoli, the daughter of original Producer, Albert R. Broccoli, and by his stepson, Michael Wilson. Other studios had given their heroes a new start to great success, so why not Bond? Comic book characters had moved away from cartoon portrayals to serious action heroes. It was time to move Bond away from the comic quips and amazing gadgets. With an eye towards a more faithful portrayal of the book than any of the previous Bond movies had done, Casino Royale starring Daniel Craig took the story back to the beginning as secret agent Bond becomes 007.
Interestingly, the series did retain one cast member. Judi Dench returned as the head of MI6 and the boss of James Bond. She sends him on his first mission to Casino Royale. Only Timothy Dalton gave us such a serious Bond, but Craig shows less emotion than any previous version of our favorite spy. He is serious and calculating in his efforts to defeat the bad guys and serve his country. If you were a fan of the novels and a more serious Bond, the “reboot” might be much to your liking.
In Casino Royale, Bond must defeat the terrorist financier Le Chiffre at the Casino. Taking away the bad guy’s money is a dangerous plan for both players. There will be no spoiler alerts, but Bond will not escape with a few double meaning quips and hidden gadgets. This will be a painful ordeal.
Not everything is resolved at the end of the movie which allows for something the series has not tried before, a story arc. Elements are carried into Quantum of Solace as Bond seeks revenge for a murder and tries to learn about the organization, Quantum. It is a more serious and more violent film than any Bond movie we have had so far. An interesting side note is that Craig and director Marc Forster wrote sections of the script due to a screenwriter’s strike. They did not receive screen credit. The role of Judi Dench is expanded this time out. It make sense to make greater use of an actor of this stature.
The third Daniel Craig movie, Skyfall, may be the best so far. It honors the Bond canon by bringing back some favorite characters in the person of new actors while making reference to times past. This time out the story centers around M (Judi Dench) and the challenges to MI6 from outside and in. The only agent she can really trust to hunt down the threat is, of course Bond, James Bond. Already in her late 70s at the time, Dench is featured in the trap that Bond lays for the bad guys and the action sequences that follow. Javier Bardem is the evil trouble maker who is out to destroy the spy agency and get M. The action is intense.
Skyfall picked up a collection of nominations and awards. Adele sang the title song which you could not escape on the radio for a long time. It won the Oscar. Miss Moneypenny returns to the franchise. If you have not seen it, I will leave the surprising revelation for you. The Quartermaster (Q) returns and he is not the old-timer we were used to seeing in Desmond Llewelyn and John Cleese. Of course, Llewelyn was a lot younger when he first appeared in a 1963 Bond film. British stage and film star Ben Whishaw is the younger Q, much to the surprise of Bond. He is more of a computer geek than a developer of gadgets, although he does have something for Bond. He is the perfect 21st century Q and a clever return for the character.
Ralph Fiennes is on hand as Mallory, M’s boss, and will play a continuing role into the next feature. Veteran Albert Finney is also on hand to support Bond in the late action sequences. All things considered, I liked the casting, the return of certain characters and even bringing back the Aston Martin. It is clever script writing by people familiar with the Bond legacy. It is directed by Sam Mendes, who returns for the 4th Craig film.
If you saw the early Bond films or read the books, you knew that James Bond was often on the trail of members of the criminal organization, SPECTRE. So it should be no surprise that the Bond reboot will find our hero on the search for information about the organization and its leader. We find another name from the past as the leader of SPECTRE, Ernst Stavro Blofeld.
SPECTRE contains all the right elements: M, Q, Moneypenny, evil villains and beautiful “Bond Girls.” The storyline incorporates elements from early Bond stories by Ian Fleming. It will be interesting to see where they go from here. Will the next storyline continue to look for elements from Fleming novels and bring them up to date?
It is impossible to compare the Craig portrayal of Bond with the previous actors. The series “reboot” has given us a Bond for the 21st century, different from what we had before. I think it was the only way to go. The Connery, Lazenby, Moore and Brosnan portrayals are charming, yet dated. Like Bond, Craig will be back.
Just for fun, even the Queen is willing to appear in a James Bond film. You will have to click the link over to You Tube to watch, as they have now blocked it from playing on other sites.
Sources Include: “Daniel Craig visits CIA in run-up to shooting new James Bond film,” TheGuardian.com, July, 6, 2018.
RELATED:
Bond, James Bond, The Sean Connery Years, Part 1
Never Say Never Again, The Sean Connery Years, Part 2
Moore Bond, The Roger Moore Years, Part 1
For Your Eyes Only, The Roger More Years, Part 2
Bond Is Back, The Timothy Dalton Years
Goldeneye, The Pierce Brosnan Years
Categories: Film Review, Hollywood, Movies, Rich Paschall
Thanks again for the information and clarifying some of the confusion for me. I watched Moonraker, and The Spy who Loved me, last night, again. Roger Moore is not one of my favorites, I never watched The Saint, until after I saw him in 007 roles. I can’t wait until the new film comes out, Daniel Craig is “tough” enough, and has a sex appeal. I’d love to see Henry Cavill (Superman) in the role, not English, so maybe that won’t happen. Idris Elba would have been an excellent choice, he has all the right qualities, but alas no, he sure would have given the role a new perspective. Too bad, because he could have been the change needed to bring the series into modern times, what do you think?
On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 12:07 AM Serendipity – Seeking Intelligent Life
LikeLiked by 1 person
Henry Cavill is English and started his career on English television. You might have caught him in some series on PBS like The Tudors or Midsomer Murders.
Idris Elba is already 46 and if they don’t make another Bond for a few years, they may not want to start a new Bond at that age. Besides, he already stated he does not want the role.
There are many names being tossed about, but producers Broccoli and Wilson have wisely been quiet on the subject.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Gary Busey?
LikeLike
UH, no. They are not look for anything that weird.
LikeLiked by 1 person
RICH, Just kidding about Busey.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I heard that Craig said he didn’t want to make another Bond movie. That he figured he was too old. Guess they made him an offer that he couldn’t refuse?
Good.
LikeLiked by 1 person
He said he was tired of it after the last one, but a long rest and a lot of money changed his mind. I think Bond 25 will be his last.
LikeLike
I watched the trailers and I’m hooked.
Leslie
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah, I found him anaemic. Didn’t care for him.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting. Many liked the portrayal, and it certainly got him a big paycheck for the next one.
LikeLike
It did. I loved the others and really was thrilled with their portrayals. I just couldn’t get into a “new” bond I guess.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Bond 25 may be his last. Of course, money talks.
LikeLike
true enough 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I liked Craig. I occasionally found the stories a bit … confusing? Like … wait a minute, where did that come from? But mostly, I like him. He at least tried acting, which was a big improvement.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The stories became a little complex, especially the first one carrying unfinished business into the next.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Rich, an excellent wrap on Bond and Craig’s portrayal of 007. I think we have to revisit “Skyfall”. I don’t immediately remember all of it.
Thanks, Rich.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks. In two weeks we will have to look at more Bonds.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Rich, I probably missed it. Where do you stand on Lanzenby?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lazenby gave an OK performance and could have gone on. I guess he was sorry years later. He was not a good as Connery, but passable.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Rich. don’t think I’ve ever seen his Bond.
LikeLike